Teesta Review: A Journal of Poetry, Volume 3, Number 1. May 2020. ISSN: 2581-7094



We All are ‘Siamese Twins’ : a Review of Sita’s Sisters


Sita’s Sisters: Sanjukta Dasgupta, Hawakal Publishers, Nov, 2019. pp 80.

 ISBN 978-93-87883-89-5









Sita’s Sisters is the 6th volume of poems by Sanjukta Dasgupta. The volume is a strong socio-political statement and is a scathing critique of patriarchy and a strong comment on some national issues. She explains the title quite self-consciously in the introduction to the volume titled “ A Preamble…”

“I feel the battle for gender equality and gender justice will have to go on, in a resolute and concerted manner, till the battle is won, no matter how long it may take .After all, unlike a man, a woman can be destroyed but not defeated.”


She had stated in the ‘Preface’ to her fifth volume of poems Laskhmi Unbound that the poems in that volume could be read as “as poems of resistance”, but she would like to urge her readers, she continues, “to read these poems as texts of resistance and resilience, confidently gesturing towards inevitable social change.” 

There are 40 well -crafted poems in the volume with metaphoric crockery of realistic images,  poems with line breaks, partial rhymes, internal rhymes, end rhymes, oxymorons,  epanaphora that makes their presence strongly felt ,  accent grouping , alliterations, all cast in a modern diction that makes reading the collection of poems never a dreary enterprise. As is evident in the title the book and also her explication, most of the poems in the volume are overtly feminist which articulate characteristic feminist concerns. On the onset, I would like  to congratulate the poet for not shying away from the feminist label as some poets or celebrities prefer to, under the pretext of ‘humanism’ or ‘postfeminism’ thereby denying the very roots of existence and allowing  masks that are not compulsory and we witness such stances often shifting.

 “Sita’s Sisters” the title poem of the volume, candidly articulates the master-slave relation of Indian marriages. The plight of the woman is analogous to Kamala Das’s an Introduction, comparable to Mamata Kalia’ s Anonymous , and many other such poems that chronicle the shared predicament of  Indian woman:

I no longer feel I’m Mamta Kalia
I am Kamala
Or Vimala
Or Kanta or Shanta
I cook, I wash
I bear , I rear,
I nag, I wag,
I sulk, I say

The woman may bear any name but the quandary remains. Likewise,  Dasgupta’s poem speaks of “Rita , Mita, Arpita, Sumita, Rinita, Lolita, Bonita, Anita, Sunita, Sucheta…” The dots are suggestive that it is a non-exhaustive list, for there are 
 
Thousands and thousands of Sita’s sisters
Programmed parrots
Pathetic puppets
Remote controlled robots (13)

We can almost touch the subdued anger in the voice. The nameless ‘Pillion Rider’ who cooks “endlessly chopping, churning, cooking …” pronounces unhesitant “my body is used by him…abused by him.” (24) “Sita’s Lament” speaks of Sita’s sons Luva and Kusha and her lament “I could never inspire them” (16) “Sita and The Golden Dear” recounts the scene from Ramayana where Sita urges Ram to get her  the golden deer and concludes “male authors of the world’s patriarchal epics blame/the bewitching femme fatales who seem bereft of shame.” (18) In “Sita meets Lakshmi” Sita meets Lakshmi Unbound and steps out into the world “her chains clattered to the ground”. Indian women have to bear the burnt of rigid conservative norms and moral codes. The poem dreams of a liberation. “Binary” is a wonderful acceptance of Alashkmi (the Lakhmi unbound), the untamed part of the woman as a “Siamese twin” of Lakshmi, the favorable and accepted form of the goddess of wealth. The “I” in Dasgupta is not a predominant preoccupation in her poems as with the confessional poets. The poetic “I” is never at the center in the poems pronouncing the predicament of women. The poetic persona can, however, be closed into the poet, if we are keen, in poems like “Why I am a Feminist”, “My Mothers’ Harmonium”, “Though Easter in Krakow”, “A Failed Dream”. “Autumn” is a poignant poem of slow ageing and its acceptance.  Dasgupta is nostalgic for once in “MY Mother’s Harmonium” as she  says she's going to let her fingers dance old tunes on the old harmonium at night and in "Although ..." we have a feel we are reading a private story. “You only wanted tea, I wanted a new world," reveals her longing not only for personal freedom, but also for a new realm.


There are poems on Kolkata, the city which is the native place of the poet; “Calcutta/Kolakata”, “Two in One”, “Park Street”, “Dumdum”. The poet is in love with the city and says “Kolkata is MY city / Though I am a citizen of the world” (60) We may question the capitalization of ‘MY’ without which the line would have been as emphatic. “The Hunted” is about Nirbhaya gang rape of New Delhi in 2012 that had sent shock waves across the country and forced our attention to the existing brutality of rape culture in India and the nasty and medieval patriarchal mindset that comes with it. “Why I am not a Humanist” is a statement probably a reaction, like we all reacted in one way or another to Meryl Streep’s evasive “I am a humanist …I am for nice easy balance” (cf. Meryl Streep on feminist question: 'I'm a humanist', Ben Child The Guardian 2nd October, 2015) Feminism is not dead, because the world still requires it and being a feminist is being a humanist. The poem works around the framework of the Kamduni rape case in June 2013. A culture that overlooks the deaths of the marginalized is taken up in “Who Killed the Little Tribal Girl?”

A sentient poet does not conceivably limit her views to the discriminations and brutalities singly against the women.  “Hunger” speaks of the disparity between the lavish lifestyle of the wealthy and the extreme hunger of the poor. The divide is also the burden of “Park Street”, for feminism seeks out equality for all. “O My God “ and Rabindranath Tagore’s “Where the Mind is Without Fear” are attempts to reread the poems in the present socio- political ambience. The poet has a prayer: “Into that Hell of horror, O Unfortunate citizens/Let not my country dive!”  “150 Years Young” is a tribute to Mahatma Gandhi and all who have been killed through intolerance as is “Dhoti Dance.” The poem beautifully contrasts the challenges thrown to choreographer by heroes in the secured ambience of movie shoots and the real challenges the real heroes hurled on the road to national freedom against the ruthless colonial powers. The title is a play on the popular song ‘lungi dance’ where Shahrukh Khan folds up his lungi to dance and  beats some goons to elope with the girl of his choice. Gandhi’s was a different dance, in the sense of freed movement, it was satyagraha, it was non-violence, unlike the  photoshopped media hero’s choreographed steps  it was  a dance of a ‘ frail old man’ who led the nation to freedom. “Protest” brings out the absence of fearless protesting voices in a “strange automated land” (76)

One dominant stylistic feature of the volume that makes its presence strongly felt is epanaphora :


I wish I was…
I wish I could…
I wish I could …
I wish I could…
 And swim
I wish I could…(15)

Or ,

They found nothing motivational
They found nothing inspirational
They found nothing aspirational (16)

Or again,

She was a furious doer
She was a restless dreamer
She was a tempest, a tornado
She was the ruthless Redeemer
She was not Bhadrakali
She was Chamunda Kali the relentless slayer
She was kali who haunted the burning ghats (25)

There are many such applications of epanaphora across the span of 40 poems,  sometimes it takes on a bard like quality like:

Youth was a time of great expectation
Youth was a time of great disillusionment
Youth was a time of trust deficit
Youth was a time of trust deficit
Youth was a time of emotional bankruptcy
Youth was a time of trauma and hypocrisy
Youth was a time when patriarchy threw off its masks and cloak  (28)

From a poet who conveys message directly like a timely served table tennis ball across a table we do not expect much oxymorons, when they come, they surprise us, like “visible and invisible/ Internal and external” (33), Silence/ Howls voicelessly (30), from being /To not being (30), from life /To lifeless (30) The epithets used are bold, almost loud , “luscious green” ,”dreary wasteland” ,”whiplash stripes” “jet black flying tresses”, “bright black halo” sometimes concise like “packed impact”. Her fondness of playfulness with words is so abundantly evident throughout the volume such as  “fasted steadfastly” (24) or in titles of poems like “Have Oil, Expect Turmoil”, or “Dress and Address” that we are almost tempted to quote Johnson’s famous "A quibble is to Shakespeare what luminous vapours are to the traveller". Like epanaphora, the poet is rather fond of alliteration:  torture and torments (30) , “gruesome grostesque and gorgeous”(25) “towering terrifying terminator” (26).

If brevity is the soul of wit, for Dasgupta’s poems are never too long, the soul of her volume is intensity. Every expression made is intensely made within the space she allows herself.

The volume is a treat for English literature students who would immediately recognize the relate lines like “if Autumn comes winter can’t be far behind, or smile at the unfailing satire in

Cows cows
Blazing bright
In my country day and night.

Those acquainted with the recent published poetry volumes will applaud the volume for a voice that is her very much her own.